Bjorn Lomborg

Get the facts straight

14 Jun2012

The Debate: Should we be doing more to combat climate change?

Published by The Independent

The Independent. Read the opinion of Bjorn Lomborg and Tony Jupiter. By Laura DavisWednesday, 13 June 2012 Fifty years ago, few people cared about pollution, deforestation, whaling or the Ozone layer. But even with an increasing awareness of issues concerning the environment, there is still a long way to go. This week The Independent is looking at the successes and failures of the Green Movement at 50, with a series of blogs and features centred around the question: “Has the environment movement been a success?”

14 Jun2012

Bjorn Lomborg - Huffpost Voces

Published by Huffington Post

Huffpost Voces. Bjorn Lomborg y el ranking de los principales retos de la humanidad, ¿preocupaciones equivocadas? Publicado: 09/06/2012 El desempleo, la crisis de la vivienda y la baja calidad de la educación pueden ser los grandes desafíos que enfrentamos en Estados Unidos y otras naciones desarrolladas, pero no son los grandes problemas del mundo actual. ¿Y el calentamiento global?. Es un problema, pero tampoco es el más importante que enfrenta el mundo moderno.

13 Jun2012

Lomborg's article: Wrongheaded in Rio

Published by Project Syndicate

Project Syndicate2012-06-13 Bjorn Lomborg Project Syndicate Tens of thousands of people will soon gather in Rio de Janeiro for the United Nations Earth Summit. The participants, ranging from weary politicians to enthusiastic campaigners, are supposed to reignite global concern for the environment. Unfortunately, the summit is likely to be a wasted opportunity.

4 Jun2012

Article in the Guardian: Ignore the heart-wrenching pictures and focus on the benefits of aid

Published by The Guardian

Posted by Bjørn Lomborg. Monday 4 June 2012 09.00 BST Targeted financial assistance offers a middle path between the arguments for and against higher development spending. Despite tough recession budgets, the UK has decided to let development spending increase. The international development secretary Andrew Mitchell described spending on aid as "not only from the British people but for the British people", contributing to "a strong, more prosperous and safer world". USAid is reducing or cutting programmes because of budget shortfalls. Australia's Labour government is...

29 May2012

Poverty Pollutes: Can we have our Earth Summit back, please?

Published by Newsweek

Newsweek Bjorn Lomborg 2012-05-28 A message from Bjørn Lomborg to organizers of the Rio+20 environmental summit: poverty pollutes. The upcoming United Nations green summit in Rio de Janeiro is in trouble—and with good reason. The planners of the mammoth event have been unable to agree on just what to say in the outcome document, ironically called “The Future We Want.” This week, dignitaries are meeting in New York City for a final attempt to find common ground. It won’t be easy. Over the past four decades, the U.N.’s concern for “green” issues has...

25 May2012

Leading economists list cheapest ways to save the world

Published by The India Times

The Indian Times India Times, 14 May, 2012. Leading economists have ranked how to best and most cost-effectively invest to solve many of the world's seemingly insurmountable problems, a Danish think-tank said Monday, calling for a shift in global priorities. "It may not sound sexy, but solving the problems of diarrhoea, worms and malnutrition will do good for more of the world's poor than other more grandiose interventions," Bjoern Lomborg, who heads the Copenhagen Consensus Centre, said in a statement. His think-tank on Monday presented the results of its third global...

23 May2012

Die Welt verbessern

Published by Die Welt

2012-05-23 75 Milliarden Dollar reichen, um große Menschheitsprobleme wie Unterernährung und Malaria bei Kindern zu beheben. Wenn alles so einfach ist, warum tun wir es nicht?

23 May2012

Las soluciones más inteligentes para salvar al mundo

Published by El Tiempo

2012-05-23 Si tuviera 75.000 millones de dólares para gastar en los próximos cuatro años y su objetivo fuera mejorar el bienestar de la humanidad, en especial, el mundo en desarrollo, ¿cómo le sacaría el máximo provecho a ese dinero? Esa pregunta la hice ante un pánel compuesto por cinco de los mejores economistas, incluidos cuatro galardonados con el Premio Nobel, durante el proyecto del Consenso de Copenhague del 2012. Se escogió a los miembros del pánel de acuerdo con sus conocimientos especializados en la definición de prioridades y por su habilidad para aplicar los principios...

21 May2012

The Smartest Ways to Save the World

Published by Project Syndicate

May 16, 2012By Bjorn Lomborg Project Syndicate COPENHAGEN – If you had $75 billion to spend over the next four years and your goal was to advance human welfare, especially in the developing world, how could you get the most value for your money? That is the question that I posed to a panel of five top economists, including four Nobel laureates, in the Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project. The panel members were chosen for their expertise in prioritization and their ability to use economic principles to compare policy choices.

20 May2012

Како да се спаси светот

Published by Utrinski

2012-05-20 Ако имате 75 милијарди долари да ги потрошите во текот на следните четири години, и вашата цел е да се унапредат благосостојбата на луѓето, особено во земјите во развој, како може најдобро да ги искористите своите пари? Тоа е прашањето што го поставив пред група од пет водечки економисти, вклучувајќи и четири добитници на Нобелова награда, на проектот Копенхаген Консензус 2012. Учесниците на панел-дискусијата беа избрани поради нивната стручност во утврдување на приоритетите и нивната способност да ги користат економските принципи за да се споредат политичките избори. (...)